Oxford House Headquarters Locations, Products, Competitors, Financials, Employees

They emphasize creative, healthy and nutritious foods, international cuisines and sustainability throughout all dining operations. Each Oxford House operates democratically, pays its own bills, and expels any member who returns to drinking alcohol or using drugs. According to Paul Molloy, who opened Oxford House in Silver Spring, Maryland in 1975, it is now one of the best-preserved houses in New York City. As a Senate committee staffer from 1967 to 1972, Molloy assisted in writing legislation. In recognizing the influence of the Oxford Group – a religious organization that was an inspiration for AA’s original founders – the company chose to call its organization Oxford House. The Wake Network of Care is a comprehensive online resource and services database designed to increase access to all community services and supports in Wake County, North Carolina. Oxford House, Inc has provided recovery and reentry housing for women and men since 1975, with over 2,800 locations world-wide and 11 in Connecticut. Oxford House of Connecticut is the state not-for-profit “franchise” of Oxford House, Inc. Each individual must be able to pay his/her share of the house expenses, which includes holding a job and/or doing service work, such as education or community service.

If anything, it seems that permitting its use by Oxford House as a residence would enhance rather than detract from the residential character of the neighborhood. Additionally, the record contains uncontroverted testimony that there have been no complaints from neighbors with regard to the use of the premises at 911 South Kings Highway. Nor is there any evidence that the presence of any of the three Oxford Houses in Cherry Hill has had any adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. Across the street from the house are a commercial office, two apartment complexes, a florist, and several offices in residential properties. On the same side of the street as the house are an office complex, a contractor who works out of his home, and residences mixed in with offices in residence-type buildings. Behind the house are another set of offices, as well as single family residences and duplexes.

Life in Oxford House residences

On March 20, 1992, however, this court entered a temporary restraining order, enjoining the Township from interfering with plaintiffs‘ occupancy of 911 South Kings Highway. Pursuant to that order, the Township reinspected the premises for maintenance code violations and, finding no such violations, issued a C.O. For the Glenfiddich residents, the dynamics of having a child in the house has also created a palpable, positive impact. Most Oxford Houses are segregated by gender, but what sets Glenfiddich apart from other locations is that it’s one of only a handful that offers housing for women with children. Opened in October 2016, Glenfiddich is currently home to seven women, and one child . At 24, Michele Richardson survived childhood sexual abuse, and the subsequent disbelief from those she finally revealed it to. Plaintiffs are a group home for recovering drug addicts and alcoholics and its residents. They seek a preliminary injunction from this court preventing the Township of Cherry Hill from interfering with their rental and occupancy of a house located in a single family residential zone in Cherry Hill. Without this C.O., plaintiffs were prohibited under the zoning ordinance from occupying the house. The complaint charges that Cherry Hill’s action constitutes discrimination on the basis of handicap in violation of the federal Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq. On the Sober Home day the suit was filed, this court issued a temporary restraining order, enjoining the Township from interfering with the immediate occupancy of the house by plaintiffs. A preliminary injunction hearing was subsequently held on May 14, 1992. Based on the following findings of fact and conclusions of law, plaintiffs‘ request for a preliminary injunction will be granted. After treatment for substance abuse, whether by prison, hospital-based treatment programs, or therapeutic communities, many patients return to former high-risk environments or stressful family situations.

Important Links And Resources

Residents assume and learn responsibility for their recovery. This allows an individual to focus on establishing a new set of personal values that center around sobriety. It allows the individual to practice the skills of responsible family and community living with their new Oxford House family. In other homes, counselors or case managers visit on a regular basis to provide in-home services. Former residents and treatment alumni may visit regularly to provide additional guidance and support. Sober living homes usually house only same-sex residents and require residents to complete either a detox program or an inpatient rehab program before moving in.

Chris Elkins worked as a journalist for three years and was published by multiple newspapers and online publications. Since 2015, he’s written about health-related topics, interviewed addiction experts and authored stories of recovery. Chris has a master’s degree in strategic communication and a graduate certificate in health communication. At night, residents usually attend support group meetings together. After school, work or treatment, residents do chores, laundry and other housework. Participation in outpatient treatment or community support groups. Today, most sober homes are unregulated, but some homes are part of larger organizations such as Oxford House, the Florida Association of Recovery Residences or the New Jersey Alliance of Recovery Residences.

All of a sober house’s residents are expected to pursue better health and a substance-free life. Finally, Mortensen, Jason, Aase, Mueller, and Ferrari studied this national sample of Oxford Houses for six years following the completion of our study in order to investigate factors related to whether the Oxford Houses remained open or closed. Results indicated a high sustainability rate (86.9%) during a six year period of time. Houses that remained open had significantly higher incomes of residents than houses that eventually closed. No other significant differences were found between the two groups of houses, including sense of community among residents, neighborhood or policy characteristics, and house age. It appears that adequate house income seems to be a necessary factor for houses continuing to function over time. Another change that was identified was the increase in the percentage of individuals in social networks who were either abstainers or in recovery.